Smalltalk O/S

Question about which tools to use, bugs, the best way to implement a function, etc should go here. Don't forget to see if your question is answered in the wiki first! When in doubt post here.
Post Reply
Blue Sky

Smalltalk O/S

Post by Blue Sky »

Could anybody give me some usefull web addresses on smalltalk O/S's :)
Top
K.J.

Re:Smalltalk O/S

Post by K.J. »

This is mostly a guess(as I don't know much about the smalltalk lanuage), but I don't think that it's possible to write an OS in smalltalk.

K.J.
Top
Schol-R-LEA

Re:Smalltalk O/S

Post by Schol-R-LEA »

K.J. wrote: This is mostly a guess(as I don't know much about the smalltalk lanuage), but I don't think that it's possible to write an OS in smalltalk.
Uh, yes and no. The original Smalltalk [73|76|80] systems were operating systems, after a fashion. Except for a very small (16KB seems to be the number I recall, but that was on a special-purpose 16-bit processor) amount of assembly code for the core bytecode interpreter and a small library of low level support routines, the whole system was written in Smalltalk, including the system kernel, the Smalltalk interpreter/compiler, the windowing manager, the editors and the networking manager.

For more details, try to locate a copy of Smalltalk-80: The Language and Its Implementation, which gives detailed information on the original implementation. It is a difficult book to get a hold of, though large university libraries often carry a copy, and Amazon does carry it as well for a surprisingly low price -

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/ ... 55-3170344

You may also want to check out

http://users.ipa.net/~dwighth/

Which has, among other things, a paper on the Smalltalk-76 system design, and samples from the book's section on implementation details.

Another copy of Dan Ingalls paper can be found at

http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/uploads/ 400/Smalltalk-76.pdf

HTH.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “OS Development”