Kernel written in bytecode

Discussions on more advanced topics such as monolithic vs micro-kernels, transactional memory models, and paging vs segmentation should go here. Use this forum to expand and improve the wiki!
User avatar
AndrewAPrice
Member
Member
Posts: 2309
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 11:00 pm
Location: USA (and Australia)

Re: Kernel written in bytecode

Post by AndrewAPrice »

This got really off topic. Not a single post on page 2 mentions "bytecode"!

Let's talk about:

1) JIT boot loaders!
2) Or a very minimal "exokernel" that basically an interpreter, so you can put as much logic as possible into a cross-platform bytecode kernel.
My OS is Perception.
rdos
Member
Member
Posts: 3333
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 1:55 pm

Re: Kernel written in bytecode

Post by rdos »

AndrewAPrice wrote: Thu Jan 30, 2025 3:11 pm This got really off topic. Not a single post on page 2 mentions "bytecode"!

Let's talk about:

1) JIT boot loaders!
2) Or a very minimal "exokernel" that basically an interpreter, so you can put as much logic as possible into a cross-platform bytecode kernel.
I think bytecode in a micro- or exokernel has exactly the same problems as in a monolithic. No need to make that a special case.

Personally, I find the microkernel concept interesting because it can isolate drivers more properly than linking it into a flat, monolithic kernel, and not because it consists of an interpreter.
Post Reply