minix 3.1's jmp statement problem

Question about which tools to use, bugs, the best way to implement a function, etc should go here. Don't forget to see if your question is answered in the wiki first! When in doubt post here.
Post Reply
ITchimp
Member
Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 8:44 pm

minix 3.1's jmp statement problem

Post by ITchimp »

i am reading minix3.1 text book, the save procedure in the book on page 712 tests
whether the caller enter the kernel for the first time (from user to kernel) or later
(from kernel to kernel).
on line 6638 jmp RETADR-P_STACKBASE(eax)

The RETADR = 24
P_STACKBASE = 0
eax is essentially esp before testing k_reenter for kernel stack switch
so this statement is essentially

jmp 24-0(esp)

how does this work? it looks rather odd to me

Code: Select all

06613
06614 !*===========================================================================*
06615 !* save *
06616 !*===========================================================================*
06617 ! Save for protected mode.
06618 ! This is much simpler than for 8086 mode, because the stack already points
06619 ! into the process table, or has already been switched to the kernel stack.
06620
06621 .align 16
06622 save:
06623 cld ! set direction flag to a known value
06624 pushad ! save "general" registers
06625 o16 push ds ! save ds
06626 o16 push es ! save es
06627 o16 push fs ! save fs
06628 o16 push gs ! save gs
06629 mov dx, ss ! ss is kernel data segment
06630 mov ds, dx ! load rest of kernel segments
06631 mov es, dx ! kernel does not use fs, gs
06632 mov eax, esp ! prepare to return
06633 incb (_k_reenter) ! from -1 if not reentering
06634 jnz set_restart1 ! stack is already kernel stack
06635 mov esp, k_stktop
06636 push _restart ! build return address for int handler
06637 xor ebp, ebp ! for stacktrace
06638 jmp RETADR-P_STACKBASE(eax)
06639
06640 .align 4
06641 set_restart1:
06642 push restart1
06643 jmp RETADR-P_STACKBASE(eax)
06644
Octocontrabass
Member
Member
Posts: 5560
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 7:01 pm

Re: minix 3.1's jmp statement problem

Post by Octocontrabass »

ITchimp wrote:The RETADR = 24
No, RETADR is 40.
ITchimp
Member
Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2018 8:44 pm

Re: minix 3.1's jmp statement problem

Post by ITchimp »

i figure that out, it is just jmp -40(eax); i didn't take into account of the precedence :(
nullplan
Member
Member
Posts: 1789
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:24 am

Re: minix 3.1's jmp statement problem

Post by nullplan »

No, it is jmp 40(eax) (BTW, that is a weird assembler syntax, like a weird hybrid between AT&T and Intel syntax). The offset is positive. It is reading the return pointer from stack and jumping there.
Carpe diem!
Post Reply