Perhaps parallel texts might be sensible, similar to how I set up my (still unfinished, admittedly)
updated user page on data structures in assembly language. Though as I mentioned when I started that page, it would be useful if the Tabbed Tables plugin for Mediawiki were installed, but I doubt that the admins would want to take the trouble to do that just for that one use case.
However, for pages which are specific to x86 (i.e., almost all of them on this wiki), the differences between the code samples as given in AT&T syntax and Intel syntax isn't really enough to justify that.
Honestly, while the differences between those two syntax styles are pretty fundamental, in many cases the differences in syntax between different Intel-style assemblers (e.g.,
MASM,
NASM,
FASM, and
YASM) are just as significant for the things the code examples are meant to demonstrate, especially if any data structures or macros are involved.
Rev. First Speaker Schol-R-LEA;2 LCF ELF JAM POEE KoR KCO PPWMTF
Ordo OS Project
Lisp programmers tend to seem very odd to outsiders, just like anyone else who has had a religious experience they can't quite explain to others.
.
