If this RSFS had more features, it would lose its whole point. I think it is still possible to implement all essential parts of a file system driver interface. Someone might call that a file system.iansjack wrote:But a filesystem is more than a means of storing a single file.
RSFS - Really Simple File System
Re: RSFS - Really Simple File System
Re: RSFS - Really Simple File System
Usefulness is an interesting topic. There are simple multi-file systems already existing. I have no new ideas for creating a simple multi-file system that is better than those existing ones are. I did create a single-file system that has something unique and I am sure it is more useful than a multi-file system that I may had created.iansjack wrote:A "filesystem" consisting of a single file is similar to a Periodic Table containing only one element - and just as useful.
Re: RSFS - Really Simple File System
Well, many things are "unique" or haven't been done (or at least not become widely known) because they are rather pointless and/or stupid. I'm not yet fully convinced that a single-file file system doesn't belong to this category.
-
- Member
- Posts: 1146
- Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:59 pm
Re: RSFS - Really Simple File System
Considering its substantiual size and the quantity of content contained herein I would like to suggest that this thread could be moved out of the Auto-Delete forum.
When you start writing an OS you do the minimum possible to get the x86 processor in a usable state, then you try to get as far away from it as possible.
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing
Syntax checkup:
Wrong: OS's, IRQ's, zero'ing
Right: OSes, IRQs, zeroing