They fixed a 30 year old in all the BSDs a couple of years backJackScott wrote:You may have meant that the UNIX OS because it's had more bugfixes than others. This is also false, since the code gets completely rewritten by some bored programmer every decade or so.
Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
- Owen
- Member
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 3:21 pm
- Location: Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
Re: Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
What could you care less about? do you mean that you couldn't care less?Coddy wrote:And? as long as that egine still revs up past 6000 RPM and my radio still plays "Don't stop me now" I could care less
"I could care less" : “an ignorant debasement of language” [1]
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 3:17 pm
Re: Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
Ah. JamesM, +1. That particular corruption is really irksome, since everyone not only uses it, but thinks it's correct. It's in the news, on the radio, in the papers, in songs...
-
- Member
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:52 am
Re: Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
Unix is evolutionary superior, not technically superior.Besides, if it was not how would it have lasted 40 years?
It's like the free market. Cheap products of low quality takes out competitors of higher quality, because they are more expensive. Unix is overly simplistic (aka low quality), as a consequence it's portable (aka cheap). The result is, it's evolutionary superior.
Compare scheduling algorithms: In Ubuntu 10.04 beta, if I play music in the background, it stops for several seconds at a time when I installing updates or if for any other reason the computer is under load.
And I've had similar problems with OpenBSD on another computer.
I've got a 2+ Ghz computer and it can't play music as my 133 Mhz Windows 95 machine. It's ridiculous. Grow up unix fanboys.
- AndreaOrru
- Member
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:50 pm
- Location: New York
Re: Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
Now that's odd, I can.Craze Frog wrote:I've got a 2+ Ghz computer and it can't play music
Last edited by AndreaOrru on Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:17 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Close the world, txEn eht nepO
Re: Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
One bad experience doesn't mean all UNIXes are bad. Besides, Ubuntu isn't exactly the most... optimized variant of Linux.
<flamesuit>
Would some mod please lock/delete this thread before it becomes a flamewar?
I hate the term "fanboy". It just makes you seem childish.Grow up unix fanboys.
<flamesuit>
Would some mod please lock/delete this thread before it becomes a flamewar?
-
- Member
- Posts: 368
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:52 am
Re: Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
Let me guess: You've got a dual core, or your computer is not under load?andreaorru wrote:I can.Craze Frog wrote:I've got a 2+ Ghz computer and it can't play music
As I said, the problem is not only with Ubuntu. It's very simple: Unix does not have audio-class scheduling, so sometimes other tasks get priority before audio. It's not a "defect". It's by design.
Re: Unix or non-Unix (was:What does your OS look like?)
Time for a fire-break.
Request granted.Synon wrote:Would some mod please lock/delete this thread before it becomes a flamewar?
Website: https://joscor.com