
Look at this screenie f. ex.:
[center]
[img width=600 height=350]http://www.distantvoices.org/bilder/bi006_GUI_graphicsdemo.png[/img]
[/center]
It has got some features which might please the user.
I know it works in vmware. I 've not yet had a chance to test the vm86-fallback which turns on in case my vm86 task craps out (which it does for sure on certain cpu's). It won't continue to boot on pc's with certain cdrom drives. Standard or not standard, sometimes cdrom drives don't speak the lingo one expects them to. crap.
The font is still atrocious.
Ugh, and the scheduler doesn't deal out timeslices as quick as it should. Maybe I should increase the pit rate from 100 hz to 1000 hz? this might actually increase responsefulness, as rr threads currently blocking don't lose their timeslices - and you know, the average thread except the very cpu bound ones spends more time waiting for some io stuff to be done.
Need to refine this thing. Meh, and the low level memory management needs to be reworked too. Too much hassles lingering around in the overcomplicated stuff I've worked out there. that's not sophisticated, thats idiotic...
Too much to do and less time available than is requested ... ah, but it's fun to study around for the m.sc.
Stay safe.
