OSDev.org

The Place to Start for Operating System Developers
It is currently Mon Apr 29, 2024 1:59 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Syntax Highlighting
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 11:13 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Posts: 684
Location: Texas
Updated the file with Combusters changes. If someone wants to modify the file to make it work better with the different assemblers that be fine. Figure out if the file could be updated so it had support for the directives and other keywords from all the assemblers or if you need to break it up into multiple files. Propose your changes, post you updates, get the majority of people to agree with you and I'll put it on the server.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Syntax Highlighting
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 11:52 am 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:40 pm
Posts: 1686
Location: Langley, Vancouver, BC, Canada
How would one go about editing said file (or adding a new lang like AT&T syntax asm?)

_________________
Image
Image
Solar wrote:
It keeps stunning me how friendly we - as a community - are towards people who start programming "their first OS" who don't even have a solid understanding of pointers, their compiler, or how a OS is structured.

I wish I could add more tex


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Syntax Highlighting
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 3:42 pm 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 3:45 am
Posts: 9301
Location: On the balcony, where I can actually keep 1½m distance
Erm chase, did you check that my version was actually free of syntax errors? I couldn't test that from where I made that. And right now, the wiki is broken. :!:

_________________
"Certainly avoid yourself. He is a newbie and might not realize it. You'll hate his code deeply a few years down the road." - Sortie
[ My OS ] [ VDisk/SFS ]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Syntax Highlighting
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2009 6:17 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 10:46 pm
Posts: 684
Location: Texas
Combuster wrote:
Erm chase, did you check that my version was actually free of syntax errors? I couldn't test that from where I made that. And right now, the wiki is broken. :!:


I did the "works for me test". Looks like I was hitting the cache or something. There seems to have been a missing comma at the end of line 109 (after 686). Appears to work now, let me know if it has more problems.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group